Two-time NBA MVP Steve Nash is the new head coach of the Brooklyn Nets, taking on the task of championship pursuit with superstars Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving. Nash has signed a four-year deal with the Nets, according to ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski.
Nash, 46, played 18 seasons in the NBA, most famously as the point guard during the Phoenix Suns’ “seven seconds or less” era. He remains a popular figure around the league, recently serving as a player development consultant for the Golden State Warriors during Durant’s time with the team. But he has no prior head-coaching experience.
The Nets fired coach Kenny Atkinson midway through the season and Jacque Vaughn took over as interim coach before the team was bounced in the first round of the playoffs. Vaughn will now be Nash’s lead assistant.
Our experts answer the big questions and look at what comes next in Brooklyn.
1. What was your first reaction to the news?
Bobby Marks: “Holy cow” is the clean version of what I said. I did not see this coming, especially since Nash has told people that he did not have a desire to become a head coach. But the ability to coach two franchise players in Durant and Irving and a roster that is built to win now — but still with an emphasis on player development — was too hard to pass up.
Tim MacMahon: I didn’t believe that Nash had interest in a full-time coaching job. I figured he was happy serving as a Warriors consultant and a member of the soccer media and being a full-time father.
Kirk Goldsberry: Surprise. There were lots of names in the rumor mill, but Nash slid under the radar. But, just as “real trades travel in silence,” it’s fair to say that some of this league’s splashiest coaching hires do too.
Tim Bontemps: Surprise about Nash finally taking the leap. Beyond his former role as a consultant with Golden State, he has been pursued for several NBA roles without taking any of them. But with the universal respect for him around the league, for his Hall of Fame career and his personality off the court, those inquiries weren’t going to stop.
Brian Windhorst: It’s a compromise and a risk. It was not a secret that Nets general manager Sean Marks was interested in having Vaughn stay in the job after his performance as interim coach. But it was also not a secret that there was a desire elsewhere in the organization for a bigger name to manage the personalities in play. So this is a heck of a brokered deal as Marks gets a guy he knows — they were teammates in Phoenix — and the players get a guy who has their respect.
2. What’s the best case for this hire being a success?
Goldsberry: That Nash is a savant. He’s basketball’s answer to Zinedine Zidane, and a true tactician who changed the way we look at guards in the post-handcheck NBA. He knifed through defenses and created shots on the edges and at the rim, while also understanding how to score the ball himself in very efficient ways. He’s one of the symbols of the league’s post-Jordan evolution, and his time with the Warriors has only furthered his understanding about how to win it all in a jump-shooting league.
MacMahon: Nash is without a doubt a brilliant basketball mind who learned from a couple of the game’s great innovators, playing for Don Nelson and Mike D’Antoni, and was a behind-the-scenes part of the Golden State dynasty. He arrives in Brooklyn with an established rapport with Durant, and given his Hall of Fame credentials, he should have immediate credibility with Irving.
Bontemps: That his understated, even-handed personality will get the best out of this team. People will immediately point to the success Steve Kerr has had with Golden State as a path for how this could go, at least in a best-case scenario. If Nash can come anywhere close to that, the Nets will be thrilled.
Windhorst: That Durant supports it. Marks made it clear, on the record, that Durant was going to get a say in this hire — as he probably should. Nash was around Durant quite a bit when he was a consultant in Golden State. That connection helps this new partnership get off the ground.
Marks: You might hear that this is comparable to when Brooklyn hired Jason Kidd. But I was part of that Nets front office in 2013, and this is not exactly the same. Those teams were built with aging veterans and no safety net. The roster was good on paper but the pieces did not fit, and Kidd was forced to develop as a coach within a tiny window. Nash will coach Durant and Irving in their primes (assuming good health), and they are under contract for three more years. There is also a strong foundation in place with both veterans (Spencer Dinwiddie and Joe Harris) and young players (Caris LeVert and Jarrett Allen). But most importantly, Nash has the full support of Marks and ownership.
3. What’s the best case against?
Windhorst: Lack of experience. This reminds me of the Kidd hire. In 2013, the Nets made Lawrence Frank the highest-paid assistant in the league, just as they are now doing with Vaughn, according to Wojnarowski’s report. They are trying to insulate Nash from his inexperience. With Kidd, it failed. With Kerr as a first-time coach, having veteran Alvin Gentry at his side, it worked. It could go either way.
The NBA playoffs have arrived, with teams competing for a championship at ESPN’s Wide World of Sports Complex at the Walt Disney World Resort.
Bontemps: There are so many intricacies to being a head coach. Not only does Nash have to learn them on the fly, he has to do so in New York, with massive expectations. As noted, this can be compared to the Kidd hire — including a prior relationship with a star player (in Kidd’s case, Deron Williams). Brooklyn will hope this lasts longer than Kidd’s tumultuous one-year run.
Marks: Inexperience. There are certainly more qualified coaches, including Tyronn Lue and Jeff Van Gundy. Nash will be walking into the media capital of the world, with expectations of leading the Nets to title contention. But with Vaughn, Nash will benefit from that institutional knowledge and Vaughn’s experience as the coach of two NBA teams.
MacMahon: Nash not only has no head-coaching experience, but he’s never even been a full-time NBA assistant coach. A Hall of Fame career as a point guard certainly doesn’t guarantee immediate success as a head coach who hasn’t paid dues as an assistant, as evidenced by the unsuccessful stint by Magic Johnson and mixed results for Isiah Thomas and Kidd. The dynamic between Nash and Vaughn — who certainly has the right to feel snubbed — will be critical.
Goldsberry: That he’s not ready. This guy has never been a head coach before, and Irving does not get along with many coaches.
4. What can Nash learn about Irving and Durant from previous coaches?
Marks: Nash has a head start from working with the Warriors. It was there that he forged a relationship with Durant that continues today. And the time working with Kerr will prove to be invaluable, not only for X’s and O’s but also in dealing with adversity and high expectations. To work with Irving, it is important for Nash to learn what he can from Irving’s previous coaches, including Byron Scott, Mike Brown, Lue and Brad Stevens.
MacMahon: Perhaps Nash could learn from Irving’s previous coaches about the intricacies of dealing with the point guard’s quirky personality, but discretion would be wise. Nash needs to earn Irving’s trust, so the new coach needs to be careful about anything that Irving might perceive as a slight.
Goldsberry: Kerr turned the Warriors’ offense inside-out when he landed in Oakland. He turned a pick-and-roll team into a motion-based, dribble-handoff team. In the process, he unlocked the team’s incredible jump-shooting potential. Then, in 2016, when the team signed Durant, Kerr let KD iso, always a good option. Nash could look to do the same in Brooklyn. This season, the Nets were one of the most active pick-and-roll teams and one of the least active dribble-handoff teams. Bottom line: They need to find ways to get their shooters clean looks just like Kerr did in Golden State. Assuming they keep Joe Harris this offseason, Brooklyn will likely start three elite perimeter shooters in Harris, Durant and Irving. The trick will be devising an offense that maximizes their talents.
Bontemps: Given how much time Nash spent with the Warriors and how close he is with Kerr, I’m sure he has learned plenty. But, more than anything else, the Nets hired Nash because of his ability to connect with their stars. The team’s statement read, “In Steve, we see a leader, communicator and mentor who will garner the respect of our players.” No prior coach for Durant or Irving was a Hall of Fame player.
Windhorst: Irving and Durant can be a challenge, especially when their moods change. They can get caught in issues with teammates or the media or on social media. But they’re both so talented, they often get the space to operate. Being their coach is less about play design or game plans than somehow giving that space while holding them accountable. The triangle was great, but it was Phil Jackson’s ability to manage personalities that was his true gift. That’s what Nash will need.
5. Fact or fiction: The Nets should make a big win-now trade.
Bontemps: Fact, without question. When you sign Durant — even as he’s coming off an Achilles tear — the goal has to be to maximize your chances of winning right now. It’s easy to say the Nets should make a big win-now trade. The question is: What big win-now trade can they make? Still, I expect the Nets to be aggressive to try to add talent to their roster this offseason.
Monday through Friday, host Pablo Torre brings you an inside look at the most interesting stories at ESPN, as told by the top reporters and insiders on the planet. Listen
Windhorst: Fact. Durant and Irving are now healthy. Leaguewide finances might be a little tighter this year, but Nets owner Joe Tsai is one of richest men in sports and can take some risks. No time like the present.
Goldsberry: Fact. The clock is already running. Boston, Miami and Milwaukee are already legit. Toronto is the defending champion. The East is not as breezy as it was when the Nets landed their dynamic duo last summer, and if Brooklyn wants to win with its current core, the team needs more firepower.
Marks: Fiction. Do the Nets need to bring in a third star? Not if LeVert can be that player. His play in the absence of Durant and Irving, especially in the games in Orlando, demonstrated his emerging all-around game, as he averaged 25, 5 and 7 while playing several positions, including point guard.
MacMahon: Doesn’t that depend on what deal might be available? It seemed premature for Irving to declare that the Nets needed talent upgrades before Durant played a single second in a Brooklyn uniform. If the Nets’ pair of superstar mercenaries are healthy, a supporting cast that features LeVert and Allen seems pretty formidable. But if LeVert and Allen can headline a package for, say, Joel Embiid? Yeah, Marks should probably pull the trigger.